AMBER ALERT

Monday


And the Press Enterprise Headline Read,  "MORENO VALLEY: Six students arrested after ruckus at high school"

"ruckus.."
"ruckus.."
"ruckus.."
PLEASE! How about some truth? Even if it might endanger an advertising dollar or two? 
After several weeks of gang and race related fights, an administrator was hit by astudent as the administrator tried in vein to break up the fight. The police came as the ruckus turned to near RACE RIOT. A police officer while attempting to restore order had to cuff a defiant student who refused to followhis/her request to return to class. At that point at least five students attacked the officer from behind. The condition of the officer is not known. 

The campus was under strict lockdown half the day. It's a good thing no students were seriously hurt but what about that officer? Its a lucky thing no one was shot at that silly "RUCKUS."

Sunday

Missing 13 year-old returned home safely Thursday afternoon
Runaway 13-year-old Moreno Valley girl, Julessa Franco missing overnight returned home Thursday afternoonJulessa was reported missing Wednesday evening when she ran away from home. Police said Julessa was suspended from school Wednesday for fighting. She came home to collect her belongings and then left on her bicycle. Authorities were concerned about a medical treatment that needed attention. Her parents reported Thursday that she came home that afternoon after spending the night at a friend’s house. Julessa said she ran away because she was afraid of getting in trouble at home. She was not injured. Still, there is a troubling common tread - Fighting.
edited by I, Praetorian

Saturday



Guggenheim, a self-described liberal Democrat, was turned off by the divisive school politics that pit "reformers" against "reactionaries," the self-limiting anti-unionism of today's charter movement


In the spring of 2009, Randi Weingarten, then head of the United Federation of Teachers, Steve Barr, the founder of Green Dot Public Schools, and I invited filmmaker Davis Guggenheim to the Green Dot New York Charter School in the South Bronx. This new small high school, which the three of us founded, is a successful partnership between Green Dot, the Los Angeles-based operator of high-achieving and unionized charter schools, and the UFT.
It was our understanding that,  Guggenheim, a self-described liberal Democrat, was turned off by the divisive school politics that pit "reformers" against "reactionaries," the self-limiting anti-unionism of today's charter movement and the counter-productive take-no-prisoners style of high-profile, short-term superintendents. Green Dot, with its impressive record of student achievement and collaborative approach, offered a powerful third-way model that works for kids, can build lasting change, and doesn't demonize hardworking adults.
Guggenheim's crew came to New York and filmed Green Dot students and teachers. Barr was interviewed on a drive through the school's South Bronx neighborhood. Guggenheim even documented the signing by Weingarten and Barr of the school's first collective bargaining agreement. This landmark thin contract makes little mention of work-rules, provides for due process but makes no mention of tenure, includes Green Dot's trademark un-timed "professional day" for all employees, and has ample opportunities for teacher input.
By all indications, Green Dot New York is already a success. In just two years, 100% of students in the school's inaugural class have passed the state's demanding mathematics exam; 100% passed the state science exam; 97% are on track to graduate in four years. Notably, these impressive results were posted by students who have overcome personal challenges: nearly 10% have a learning disability; another 10% are English Language Learners. And family income is low: 88% of students are eligible for free and reduced-price lunch.
Some reasons for this success include small classes that are scheduled in blocks for more meaningful instructional time; teachers have manageable work loads and keep office hours to give students extra help; and weekly grade-level meetings keep students from slipping through the cracks. These and other features operate in a culture of trust, hard work and high expectations that is shared and nurtured by the students, teachers, and school leaders.
Unlike many popular reforms, the school's founding by Green Dot and the UFT is a powerful and relevant example of management-labor cooperation. This collaboration is codified in a different kind of labor agreement that some philanthropists and academics have advocated for years. It includes provisions sought by many district leaders. Weingarten herself has touted the school as a model partnership that yielded a mold-breaking contract.
Davis Guggenheim, conveniently, had much of this on film. Given his belief that teacher tenure "is the most intractable problem in public education," Green Dot New York, with its thin, no-tenure contract, was a model worth depicting. Yet his new movie, "Waiting for Superman," leaves the school--and its promising, scalable innovations--on the cutting room floor. Apparently Guggenheim was more interested in dramatic narrative than documentary accuracy. In depicting hero reformers saving innocent children from villainous unionists, Guggenheim has told a theatrical story that aims for moral indignation through over-simplification. His calculated omission of Green Dot and similar efforts, such as the Union Park High School in Chicago, present caricatures instead of characters and ignore the category-defying examples that represent relevant and replicable alternatives that can drive sustained change.
Surely the subtle and wonky nuances of labor reform are hard to depict on the big screen, and Guggenheim can almost be forgiven for being a filmmaker, not a policymaker. And no doubt, hard choices are made in the editing room. But in choosing--and reinforcing--the clichés of school reform, Waiting for "Superman" naively endorses an inflammatory politics that only hardens people and their positions.
Some reformers are hoping that "Waiting for Superman" will do for public education what An Inconvenient Truth did for the environmental movement, but I think it unlikely that this new film builds a broad coalition and a collaborative politics of change. The film's endorsement of conventional "truths" about the good guys and bad guys of public education misses an opportunity to expose and discredit today's divisive school politics, to expect more of people, and to promote the potential of unconventional reforms that would have inconveniently disrupted the narrative of his film and today's school reform movement.

THOSE WHO VICTIMIZE CHILDREN ARE USUALLY NOT STRANGERS

By Ernie Allen, President and CEO

The recent events at Penn State University and Syracuse University serve as reminders that the sexual abuse and exploitation of children is an all-too-present fact of modern life.  Yet, millions of Americans do not believe that this problem exists at all.  Why?
Overwhelmingly, the child victims do not tell.  Leading scholars and researchers tell us that at least 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 10 boys will be sexually victimized in some way before they reach the age of 18, and just 1 in 3 will tell anybody about it.  These are America’s hidden victims.  We have made progress as a nation in attacking this problem but even today, two out of three child victims suffer in silence.  They don’t tell Mom, they don’t tell Dad, they don’t tell anybody.
Millions doubt the existence of these heinous crimes for another reason.  The offenders do not match society’s stereotype.  Most Americans want to believe that someone who would prey upon a child sexually is evil-looking, a menacing, frightening stranger.
Yet, we have learned that most often those who victimize children are not strangers to the child, they are known to the child.  They seek out legitimate access to the child.  We should never be shocked when someone who abuses a child is a volunteer or employee of a youth-serving organization, or a school, or a daycare center, or many other settings that provide easy, low-risk access to children.  That is why the leading child-serving organizations have taken bold steps to do background screening of their staff and volunteers, and then monitor and supervise the interactions between adults and children.
In monitoring sex offender treatment groups and programs, one hears a chilling word, “grooming.”  Most often, these offenders who prey upon children do not snatch their victims randomly from the streets, they groom their victims, win their confidence and trust through friendship, kindness, and then they violate it.  In so many of these cases, the child is made to feel responsible, like it is his or her fault.  And the child is often intimidated or threatened by this person of trust and authority.
Even if they decide to tell, will anyone listen to them?  Will anyone understand?  These children feel that no one will believe them even if they do speak out, and too many adults simply do not listen to or understand what children try to tell us.
The offenders are not dirty, menacing strangers, they are respectable citizens – doctors, lawyers, businessmen, teachers, police officers.  Often they are people who outwardly show deep and enduring commitment to helping children in need.
What can you do?  What can every citizen do?  First, communicate with your children and empower them.  Make sure that they understand that you love them, trust them, believe them and that if anyone ever touches them in a way that makes them feel uncomfortable, they should tell you or a trusted adult.
Second, the first line of defense is a vigilant public.  If you see it, know about it or suspect it, report it.  Call your local police and then call 1 (800) THE LOST or report it to www.cybertipline.com, at the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
The sexual exploitation of children is not a problem that only happens somewhere else.  It is happening in big cities and small towns across America.  Thousands of children fall victim to sexual exploitation every year.  We need to do more.  Because every child deserves a safe childhood. 
This commentary first appeared in the Opinion Section on FoxNews.com on 12/09/2011

This is COURAGE - YOU NEED TO KNOW WHY. As Educators We are Loosing the Promise of Public Education at the Hands of Very Similar Types of Criminals! Its Happening All over the State.

Please understand this is a 70+ year-old former U.S. Prosecutor! This man, Dr. Richard I. Fine is my hero and model for my fights to come with Moreno Valley USD which also is one of the most litigated school districts of it's size in the inland empire. For over 20 years the corruption spearheaded by the personalities of the COWARDS and BULLY BOYS RUNNING MVUSD'S HUMAN RESOURCES has rotted the structure of our district.  One of the former HR bully boys participated in felony misuse and theft of public funds as well as an act of agrregious criminal Nepotism as defined in California State Educ. Code. Another, HR thug, a convicted felon used an unregistered pistol firing at a car fleeing his house with his own daughter and her girlfriend inside the car. He was and is still employed and partially running a MVUSD middle school dealing with children daily, in spite his extraordinarily explosive temper. The current HR coward is mentioned as helping to cover up directly or indirectly the theft of  or miss use of  student funds that totals in the multiple $100,000s in cash  EVERY YEAR.


The man most responsible for this system wide cover-up, a man who lied more than once to me when I was looking for help with the apparent criminal activity I stumbled upon, was fired early this year then allowed to stay on with a double demotion to assistant principal. The Board was afraid that out and out firing would tempt him to tell all. 


Due to years of cover up i.e. elimination of positions with the power of oversight by some of the Superintendents and their assistants, including Bob Crank who was one of the key players, most area taxpayers are paying twice over for there child's education without knowing and some of that money is stolen in cash! Watch for the documentation and names to come.  BUT lets not forget the School Board who hires these people, among which contains a documented CHILD MOLESTER (who as part of his duties regularly visits elementary schools unescorted) and a yet to be charged; a criminal who used the power of the office for... well, come back and see. Another is on the payroll of a local Developer and member of the shadowy Jewish "Gold Trust" and its silent charter. An organization and individual who's home is somewhere in Beverly Bills, CA. I have fired off a letter to the Jewish Defense League* asking point blank if they are associated... 


Folks I lack the imagination to make this stuff up. I was as disbelieving as you probably are. Worse yet, there is more than eluded to herein.


Sincerely,
I praetorian


*The Jewish Defense League or JDL is a Jewish nationalist and far-right organization whose stated goal is to "protect Jews from antisemitism by whatever means necessary".[1] While the group asserts that it "unequivocally condemns terrorism", and claims to have a "strict no-tolerance policy against terrorism and other felonious acts,"[2] it was described as "a right-wing terrorist group" by the Federal Bureau of Investigation[3] in 2001, and as a hate group involved in "anti-Arab terrorism" by the Southern Poverty Law Center.[4] According to the FBI, the JDL has been involved in plotting terrorist attacks within the United States.[3] Outside the FBI, the  Anti-Defamation League (ADL)[2] and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).[3 are the largest watch dog organizations monitoring hate groups in the U.S.  





Sunday

THIS idea... it's a damn GOOD ONE

I don't who came up with this idea... but it's a damn GOOD ONE!
Officials in Moreno Valley USD hope all students will take advantage of the free breakfast program that starts Tuesday at all 37 school sites in the Moreno Valley Unified District.

“A well-nourished child is one ready to learn,” said Carla Lyder, the district’s assistant director of nutrition services. “Our goal is to provide good food as part of the equation to support education. ”Ideally, she wants every one of the district’s 36,000 students to try the daily, no-cost breakfasts, which include waffles, pancakes, sausages, muffins, fruit, French toast, bagels and low-sugar cereals.

Research has linked school breakfast programs with higher test scores and grades, improved attendance and fewer referrals to school nurses. In California, evidence is mostly anecdotal. Some districts have begun to document the changes in student performances that follow school breakfasts.
About 56 percent of California students qualify for free or reduced-price meals, but less than one-third of those eligible take part in school breakfasts.
Missed meals mean missed money for cash-strapped districts. Statewide, they would have received an additional $350 million in federal meal reimbursements if school breakfast participation were as high as lunch participation. For districts hobbled by budget cuts, the reimbursements are critical.

In Moreno Valley Unified, breakfast participation is only one-third of that for the lunch program, which draws 22,000 to 25,000 students a day.
The social stigma, difficulty getting to school early and dependence on a parent’s work schedule are deterrents to school breakfasts, Lyder said. What’s more, each school’s breakfast times are different, some starting at 6:15, others at 8:20.

The district projects the free meal will increase breakfast participation a minimum of 10 to 15 percent. The nutrition department will order food week to week and buy more as numbers rise, Lyder said.The district won’t touch its reserves or general fund, but will re-invest money from the low-cost eligibility program to pay for the universal breakfast, according to Lyder. A computer program is in place to daily track breakfast eaters at each site, she said.


Ms. Lyder is right. It not only won't cost the district any extra, but may add to  it's shakey revenue stream. Not only, but it will partially change the socio-economic range of the district which in this case may raise test scores overall. NOT TO MENTION its the right thing to do. IMAGINE!



Thursday

Can Anyone One of Us Wholly Appreciate the Sacrifice and Powerful Unwavering Strength in This Man's Character? Imagine Where We Might be if Only... 



Wednesday



This post was co-authored by Elizabeth Arce
Edited by I, Praetorian

 It seems that every time you turn on the news some new technological innovation is being announced.  For example, recent weeks have seen the unveiling of new tablet computers and smartphones.  In addition, social media platforms such as Facebook and LinkedIn are constantly announcing upgrades to their websites to improve the way users communicate with one another via the internet.  However, just as technology is rapidly changing, the laws regulating the use of social media by school and public employees also continue to evolve in random statute and always after the fact.
Since these initial blog posts and article on legal developments regarding employee social media use, the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) Office of General Counsel released a report analyzing various issues relating to social media use by employees and employer policies that attempt to regulate it.  In addition, two NLRB Administrative Law Judges (“ALJs”) issued decisions that provide further guidance in these areas. 

In Hispanic United of Buffalo (“HUB”), an ALJ ordered a nonprofit corporation to reinstate five employees who were fired after posting comments on Facebook criticizing workload and staffing issues.  The ALJ concluded that the employees engaged in protected concerted activity because they were discussing matters that involving terms and conditions of their employment. 
In Knauz BMW, an ALJ found that a car dealership’s employee handbook contained policies that restrict and limit an employee’s right to engage in concerted activity.  However, the ALJ upheld the employer’s termination of an employee who posted pictures of an accident at another dealership, also owned by his employer, with unflattering comments about the salesperson involved in it on the grounds that the posting was not protected concerted activity.
These recent pronouncements from the NLRB clarify the law regarding the scope of social media use by employees and provide the following guidance to employers:
1.    Employees’ Social Media Postings With Each Other About The Terms and Conditions of Their Employment Are Protected.  Employees engage in protected concerted activity when they use social media to communicate with one another about work related issues.  Concerted activity will also be found when the employee posts comments that express the views of other employees or that attempt to initiate or induce coworkers to take group action.  This can include complaints among employees about commissions, tax withholding practices and workload and staffing issues.  Thus, posts that are not work related or that express individual gripes, frustrations or complaints are not protected. 
2.    Work Related Postings That Are Sarcastic or Mocking in Tone May Be Protected.  In Knauz BMW, the ALJ considered two Facebook postings by the employee.  The first involved criticism of a sales event, including the inadequacy of the food being served, which employees felt could affect employee compensation.  The second posting involved an accident at another dealership.  The ALJ found that the posting concerning the accident was not protected concerted activity, and that the employer terminated the employee for that posting.  The decision discusses what language rises to the level of disparagement necessary find otherwise protected activities unprotected.  The NLRB has found statements that are mocking or sarcastic ,and terms such as “a-holes” and a “cheap son of a bitch” attributed to supervisors to be protected concerted activity when uttered in the course of otherwise protected concerted activity.  Employers must meet a very high threshold to prove language is disparaging and beyond protection in the context of employees acting together to challenge their working conditions.
3.    Polices That Can Be Reasonably Interpreted to Restrict Employees’ Right to Engage In Concerted Activity Are Improper.  In evaluating whether a social media policy improperly limits an employee’s ability to engage in protected concerted activity, employers should ask whether the rule or policy explicitly prohibits the exercise of this right or would reasonably tend to chill the employee’s exercise of it.  In order words, policies that could be interpreted as discouraging an employee to discuss the terms and conditions of employment are likely improper.
4.    Policies That Can Be Reasonably Interpreted to Protect the Relationship Between the Employer and Its Customers Are Proper.  In Knauz BMW, the ALJ determined that language in an employee handbook stating “[a] bad attitude creates a difficult working environment and prevents to [employer] from providing quality service to our customers” was proper.  The ALJ reasoned that the employer had a right to demand that its employees not display a bad attitude towards customers in order to protect the employer’s relationship with its customers.
Employers who have adopted social media policies should review them with the above guidelines in mind.  Finally, because the law in this area continues to rapidly change, employers should stay tuned to this blog and our Twitter (@lcwlegal and hashtag #lcwsocialmedia) for further updates.
·        

Tuesday


Did I Forget to Mention...
Moreno Valley Unified School District is falling possibly spiraling into the abyss of financial insolvency? That's the truth as best I can determine from financial records from previous years. The District can't even pay off the last attorney firm they used to defend themselves from the repercussions of their own petty often criminally liable personal attacks on their own employees by MVUSD administrators OR the swollen egos of the senior board trustees.


Go ahead ask, "now how would he know that?" I too have fallen victim to the same unwarranted attack on my professional and personal reputation and ultimately my employment for drawing attention to the multitude of problems in house at the district level first. Nothing. More cover-ups. More lies. The same things I write about here in my blogs. My exercise in 1st amendment rights. As it turns out HR and two senior board members are so anxious to get rid of me that they turned down their own attorneys' advice to settle this matter on two previous  occasions - that's right they ignored their own attorney's high-high priced advice twice in two months. They are burning your tax money on personal vendettas that could cost the district over a $million$ dollars in combined attorney's fees and court costs alone. If we go there, that will only be the price of admission. Three to Five years including appeals. WOW that's a ton of your money snatched right out of your child's education. You know the free and adequate education promised by state and federal law. As of today however that is the route we seem to be headed for. 


These two senior trustees and their HR puppet have squandered upwards of $30,000 dollars of your tax money to date on trying to conjure up a story that even their own attorney's know won't fly. All to make me go away. 8 mo.s without pay. Put off work for three months without explanation. Then the fictionalized allegations against me. Denied me due process. They will reach an easy $200-300 thousand if we have to ready for to civil action after the hearing on Thursday January 19, 2012. 


I tried as best I could to avoid this route. I have no interest in taking money from the kids I care about. I met secretly with Jesus Holguin in late November, 2010 and he promised to help that the problem was "being addressed as we spoke..." He lied. He didn't keep a single promise to correct the problem(s). He simply wanted to see the information I had gathered on Victoria Baca. A former board trustee that a friend and I helped to unseat. In fact Jesus voted to try and find a way to dismiss me, or starve me out. And Rick Sayre backed or forced that play. Rick is up for reelection in November. I now know why he doesn't want me digging around or anyone else for that matter. Much to come on his shenanigans and bully-boy tactics. He was right not to want me nosing around 
but 8 months without work tends to make me very curious. Come back soon, here at the only place you can get your hands dirty an keep your nails clean.
I, Praetorian
Prestige and respect, not only salary, are seen as crucial elements in the quest for a truly professional teacher workforce
One of the most troubling things that the 2010 National Teacher of the Year, Sarah Brown Wessling, hears about her profession can be summed up in a single observation: the idea that she and other top-performing colleagues are "just" teachers.
The word "just" serves as a reminder of a subtle mindset among some in the United States that a career in K-12 teaching, while considered noble, is nevertheless somehow seen as beneath the capacity of talented young men and women.
"People go into teaching because they are committed to young people, because they are incredible communicators or experts in their field," says Wessling, a high school English teacher in Johnston, Iowa. "But many people in our country see teaching as though it were something one chose as a fall back career. A type of government job with mediocre pay but good benefits. plug in for 20+ years then retire. WRONG! COULDN'T BE MORE SO. EMPLOYEES WITH THAT MIND SET USUALLY WASH OUT IN 3-4 YEARS. OR THEY FAST TRACK THEMSELVES OUT OF THE SCHOOL SITE AND INTO THE DISTRICT OFFICE ADMINISTRATION. THEY AREN'T GOING TO THROW AWAY THE 50-60 THOUSAND DOLLARS IT TOOK TO FIND OUT THEY HATE WORKING WITH KIDS AND PARENTS. IT IS NOT A AVOCATION FOR THE WEAK OF HEART OR LACKING IN PASSION FOR THE ENDEAVOR.

Its hard work and most people have unrealistic expectations of today's students and parents. And our own society sees us as mildly noble or just not ambitious enough to get into a real (read paying) field.
In Finland, the country whose education practices we've come to admire even more than the Japanese system that "W" and his cronies so often falsely and purposefully mislead us to believe were the apples to apples, the perfect example for the absolute need for NCLB. Lets not forget that NCLB was normed on fabricated test data from one or more districts in the Houston, Texas area that admitted to fixing the numbers. A thinly veiled attempt at crippling the public education system in lieu of a more privatized thereby inherently more exclusive system. I have joked sardonically about "W's" dream of a Walmart National Elementary School District for kids whose parents couldn't afford to pad their vouchers and send their children to the "nicer schools." The schools whose teachers weren't Chinese Factory Workers on assignment by the Beijing Government, under contract with Walmart Stores. International.

Friday

What would YOU do...

IF ONLY YOU KNEW?
Well folks, the "Press Enterprise newspaper" dida perfunctory articule on money missing from student fundcoffers at three Moreno Valley Unified schools and how the district'saccounting department was soooo contrite.
They are going to fix those schools!Attendance and all! If only those three schools represented the real problems.The fiscal wrong doings at Moreno Valley Unified School District are rampantand well beyond any three schools. So too, it has been alleged thatsuch abuses extend back at least 15 years. However, the problems worsened and becamemore obvious under former Assistant Superintendent Robert Wallace Crank. Crank,eliminated all positions of fiscal over sight regarding MVUSD'S loosely andrandomly regulated student fundraising. There has not been anymeaning full systematic structure for handling and accountability in that 15year span . No training of state aligned methods or manuals, bookkeepingsoftware has been mysteriously been wiped out completely (with no server levelback up to be found), on ASB account’s computers. Amazingly, on at least three ocassions; just aheadof some official inquiry by an outside agency or the treat thereof.
I do not however, think of the new Superintendent Dr. White ascomplicit. I believe though she has been kept uninformed by individuals withvested interest in keeping these things hidden. In any case, most of the personnelwho knew the truth have left the district by now. Some retired some forced out by a VERY complicit school board  Those whohave not gone and might speak honestly, are systematically being forced out by deceit,harassment,  and lies in the hopes ofsilencing the truth once and for all and avoiding an incredible amount of liability andembarrassment. The majority of this unethical and sometimes illegal actioncomes from a top administrator who 20 days into his new job at MVUSD, said he “wasgoing to clean up the reputation of HR.” referring to the unethical behaviorsnotorious of the previous HR Director.
I am referring for the moment, of nearly half a million dollars a year.  May bemore? Probably more. Stolen, misplaced, misappropriated, or just gone. One of theproblems is almost all fundraising is done in cash. Due to thelogistics of handling returned checks, the schools seldom take them anymore. Large sumsof cash were kept in just about any lockable container. Sometimes for months onend.  As an example: In a singular ac, five years ago, $10,000 in cash wasstolen directly from the safe at one MVUSD middle school. Under the circumstancesI was told, it took less than ten minutes to accomplish and there were only fivepeople who had all the necessary keys to walk in and out with the money. Noinvestigation occurred and no further mention was made of it.  The onlypersons who should have the key and safe combination are the ASB (AssociatedStudent Body or "government") accountant and the school principal. The cash sits with no oversight and no truly accurate record of it'sexistance.  No club fundraising cash deposits go through the ASB cabinetapproval process as do purchase orders or check requests. They are handleddirectly by the ASB accountant under the over site and responsibilityof the principal.

About MVUSD "clubs." In general regarding fundraising; it is andhas always been mandatory for students to pay to participate inextra-curricular activities. Fundraising seldom covers even half thestudent expenses. Recently this practice has been deemed ILLEGAL inlaw suits against surrounding school districts. However at MVUSD, themoney parents pay is shown on School Board Minutes as “Voluntary ParentContributions,” but the child can't participate without paying the fee. Therefore, it appears that participation is neither voluntary nor acontribution. (Handout, gift, or offering.) The courts have recentlyinterpreted "fair and adequate" to mean that all public schoolactivities requiring parents to pay money or monies for participation; Must beoffered free to any and all eligible students. This includes extracurricular sportsand any student clubs. It is a violation of the law to charge parents or forcestudents to fund raise their share. In one discussion, thepractice was deemed "double dipping," because parents pay for theirchild's education through taxation. The court's interpretation extended toinclude uniforms and protective gear.

In keeping with previous years, more than one MVUSD principal oflate has been implicated in possible financialwrongdoings regarding student funds. While seldom investigated byMVUSD in any fair and through manner, the problem itself bestdocumented under deposition (Williams v. MVUSD 2006) by former Director ofSecondary Education, Kim Kruger. Who further admitted under oath that theproblem was commonplace and that he himself had problems regarding studentfunds as principal at Valley View High School.

More recently, regarding a here to unnamed middle school and their ASB studentfund for the 2009-2010 school year; it opened school with a ledger balancerollover from the previous year, somewhere in the vicinity of$115,000.  Which is extremely high and a strange discrepancy in therollover for any student fund account. This is the ASB general fund to whichall other clubs, excluding parent run booster clubs, deposit their fundraisingcash, draw their money, pay their bills and obtain their club status.At the end of these first two months, this middle school's account ledgerreportly dropped to just over $4,000.  The ASB ledgerentries for this school,  during this time period, are said to not makesense nor add up to any where near $100,000. This example was but one schooland one school year in Moreno Valley Unified School District.

Next report; ASB and Booster Clubs.The difference between the two and why both are ripe for cashskimming.
Posted by I, Praetorian at 8:31 AM 
Praetorian: spent 4 years as an ASB co-director for MVUSD

Sunday

Just My Opinion: Of the Two Young Men Shot in Redlands, CA...

Just My Opinion:
Thanks Dmayn1,
I knew one of the boys, Andrew from his time in our middle school. He was a good kid. It wasn't until today that I looked at his picture and realized that I knew him. ...its hard.


I don't know the details of what happened or how it was handled by authorities. But none of our children should ever be at risk of being hurt or killed anywhere anyway.


Our society has grown fat and lazy in its collective morals. We are loosing moral ground when as Americans we have every reason and opportunity to be gaining. The way we protect and nurture our kids is a flat out disgusting shame. From something like this to the way we treat children in Foster Care. WE choose the alter of the almighty green back long before the complete protection and education of our children.


January 20, 1961. JFK said in his inaugural address. " We hold in our mortal hands the means to cure all forms of human suffering and destroy all forms of Human life." We are still fighting over moral ground and electing fools to compromise it.


Seems between the life and times of our children are always used in compromise to the most base and self-important of the rich and therefore powerful eight percent of this American experiment in democracy fueled entirely, not by the greatness of our human possibilities but the hoarding selfness that exists in us all.




School Counseling Podcast

Help and Hope

The Silent Suffering of Too Many Teenage Girls


WHY WAIT UNTIL APRIL? CHILD ABUSE AWARENESS SHOULD NEVER END




2011 marred by test cheating scandals across US

DORIE TURNER, AP Education Writer 
Dec. 27, 2011 9:16 PM ET

ATLANTA (AP) — It was the year of the test cheating scandal.
From Atlanta to Philadelphia and Washington to Los Angeles, officials have accused hundreds of educators of changing answers on tests or giving answers to students. Just last week, state investigators revealed that dozens of educators in 11 schools in Georgia's Dougherty County either cheated or failed to prevent cheating on 2009 standardized tests.

In July, those same investigators accused nearly 180 educators in almost half of Atlanta's 100 schools of cheating dating back to 2001 — which experts have called the largest cheating scandal in U.S. history. At least 20 students have been charged on Long Island with cheating on SAT and ACT college-entrance exams by paying someone to take the test for them.

"It's a year in which cheating became a national scandal, a scandal of national proportions," said Bob Schaeffer, a spokesman for the National Center for Fair & Open Testing, which advocates against high-stakes testing. "The Atlanta case forced policymakers and journalists in other jurisdictions to look to see if there's anything similar going on in their backyards."

Experts say some educators have bowed to the mounting pressure under the federal No Child Left Behind law as schools' benchmarks increase each year toward the ultimate goal of having all children reading and doing math at their grade level by 2014. Teachers in Atlanta reported that administrators created a culture of "fear, intimidation and retaliation" where testing goals had to be met no matter what, according to investigators.

"This problem existed before No Child Left Behind, but NCLB has exacerbated the problem, clearly," said Walter Haney, a retired Boston College education professor and expert on cheating. "I think testing is really important, but the problem has been the misuse of test results without looking behind the test scores to see who and who is not tested."

Federal officials have been saying for more than a year that the law, which is four years overdue for a rewrite, doesn't accurately depict what's happening in schools. While federal lawmakers agree the law needs to be fixed, an overhaul has become mired in the partisan atmosphere in Congress.

At President Obama's invitation, states have begun filing waivers to get relief from the law. Under the 11 waivers already filed, states are asking to use a variety of factors to determine whether they pass muster and to choose how schools will be punished if they don't improve. Among the factors that could be used are college-entrance exam scores or the performance of students on Advanced Placement tests.

At least 39 states, plus Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, have said they will file waivers, though it is unclear how many will get approved.

In Pennsylvania, an investigation continues into irregularities found in 2009 state standardized tests in reading and math. The probe began last summer after a routine forensics report flagged "highly improbable" results in 90 schools across the state.

The state education secretary ordered the 50 districts representing the named schools to conduct internal investigations and submit reports to him by Aug. 15., But nearly four months later, the reports are still being analyzed and have not been made public.

Twenty-eight of the flagged schools were in Philadelphia, the state's largest district. District representative Fernando Gallard said the system is talking with the state Department of Education over how to move forward with the cheating investigation.

In Washington, D.C., federal and city officials are investigating possible cheating in more than 100 schools from 2008 to 2010. The unusually high rate of erasures in those schools became known after a USA Today investigation into improbable test gains in more than 300 schools in six states and D.C.

City officials tossed out test results for three classrooms in May because of proven cases of cheating.

A Waterbury, Conn., principal resigned earlier this month over an alleged cheating scheme on the Connecticut Mastery Test. A dozen teachers who were also caught up in the scandal lost 20 days of pay and have to perform 25 hours of free tutoring.

In Los Angeles, teachers at three schools have resigned after being accused of coaching students or changing answers on tests. The test scores at two of those schools have been thrown out.

Schaeffer, who follows cheating scandals closely for years, said he's seen as many cheating stories this year as in the last half-dozen years combined. He said there have been confirmed cases of cheating in 30 states and D.C. in the last three years.

___

Reporters Kathy Matheson in Philadelphia and Brett Zongker in Washington, D.C., contributed to this report.

___